BCC Mantovabanca 1866 - disservizio
Considering that did not respond to my email, I wanted to inform them of how they ended the payment of the MAV. Since I was there I also informed the consumer association.
to bccsegreteria@mantovabanca1896.bcc.it, info@bcconline.it
cc info@consumatori.it
Hello
a result of that I enclose my report of 29/09/2008, regarding the refusal to flush a MAV can confirm that a bank other than your agreed without objection to the collection of the same.
sorry for the lack of service that you would be required to provide,
saddened by the lack of response the previous email,
not fail to share with others my experience to advise
your "services" bank. I cordially greet
Marco Lease
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Difference Between A Sportster 4 And Sportster 5
sacrificio di animali per il progresso della scienza
scientists to discover a lot of information on the human body have had to sacrifice animals, animals do not think I agree that it is absolutely wrong to kill an animal to do the experiments, you What do you think?
But after they die?
To do the experiments many animals die, but this is needed to allow scientists to do experiments and learn how the human body also.
But I do not want ....
But you eat chicken?
But because there is only one for dinner!
Why not do it on dead people?
Indeed many discoveries were made by examining dead people, but this is not always possible. For example, to understand what happens if a damaged part of the brain can not do it on a person already dead.
But let free the animals?
this is not always possible, and indeed most of the time they die
To me it seems a bit 'wrong.
scientists to discover a lot of information on the human body have had to sacrifice animals, animals do not think I agree that it is absolutely wrong to kill an animal to do the experiments, you What do you think?
But after they die?
To do the experiments many animals die, but this is needed to allow scientists to do experiments and learn how the human body also.
But I do not want ....
But you eat chicken?
But because there is only one for dinner!
Why not do it on dead people?
Indeed many discoveries were made by examining dead people, but this is not always possible. For example, to understand what happens if a damaged part of the brain can not do it on a person already dead.
But let free the animals?
this is not always possible, and indeed most of the time they die
To me it seems a bit 'wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)